Dave Parker’s It Watches, Horror From An Internal Perspective

Dave Parker, Director DecayMag.com Ivan Djurovic, Dave Parker It Watches

Writer(s): 

Ivan Djurovic (story and screenplay)

Dave Parker (story and screenplay)

Release Date: 6th December 2016

Release Format: Video on Demand 

MPAA Rating:  N/A

Genre: Thriller  

Running Time: 1h 26min

Synopsis: 

Andre, recovering from a recent accident, agrees to help his friend Robert by taking over a house-sitting job at a creepy home nestled in the hills above Los Angeles. As night comes, the house reveals its insidious nature as Andre begins hearing ominous sounds and experiencing strange occurrences throughout the house that lead him to believe he is not alone, and that someone, or something is in the house with him.

IMDB.com

Overview:

The supernatural is a fundamental, recurring theme within the found footage Horror. In Dave Parker’s latest release; It Watches the central Horror lies with internal monsters.

It Watches puts the classic haunted story into a modern setting. A suburban Los Angles serve as the surrounding environment. The terror lurking within the abode is not taken from a time-tested playbook.

As with most found footage films, attention resides on a limited cast. For the majority of the film co-writer/actor Ivan Djurovic offers a solo performance. Andre, the character Djurovic portrays has a basic yet complicated story.

To sum, Djurovic and Parker penned an interesting narrative. It Watches does not fall into typical processes in found footage films. The film offers a well thought out platform for an evil phantasm.

DecayMag.com Ivan Djurovic, Dave Parker It Watches

Pros: 

It Watches delivers a different artistic perspective. Although the production sways in the conventional found footage feel it doesn’t linger. The account does not unfold before the camera lens. Instead, the first person perspective serves as an extension of the narrative. Audiences will not endure an amateurish shaky handheld presentation. This is most fortunate for sensitive viewers suffering from vertigo.

Speaking of which, It Watches sits comfortable with a Hitchcockian descriptive. The horror is literal and figurative. A level of suspense has a multi-level presence. Audiences will try their best solve the unfolding events.

The narrative ventures in different directions each hinting on possible outcomes. Hints of the supernatural and hints of an urban legend slasher develop in Act II. Once in fruition, It Watches toys with suspenseful moments.

Is the film a supernatural thriller? Is the film a psychological thriller? The defining moment is the dramatic reveal within the closing minutes of Act III.

The composition has a good pace. The script is well-written with defining significance. As for the portrayals, each performer displayed refined skill in his and her abilities. Each character is interesting and contributes to the story. Andre, the protagonist has just enough information to maintain a connection with the audience.

DecayMag.com Ivan Djurovic, Dave Parker It Watches

Cons:

At first glance, the film begins with traditional found footage approach. In Act I presented are cheap scare gimmicks and a basic foundation. Yet, by the mid-point in Act II a storyline develops and captures attention.

The first person perspective was not necessary. The mere venture into this realm dilutes a solid tension-filled presentation. Also, the pace of the film felt muddled with unnecessary presentations. A walkthrough of the home, checking the contents of the fridge, smoking weed. These scenes were monotonous and didn’t have the impact as intended.

The narrative failed to venture deeper at the core. Audiences may find the finale hard to accept. Raised are more questions that answers. If suspicions were evident why wait to concoct a resolution? How did the supporting characters gain suspicion? The problem addressed seem too elaborate. Although clever, the ending is not realistic. Even so, the narrative does make for a suspenseful Thriller.

Rating Score:  0-10 Avoid | 11-20 Mediocre | 21-30 Good | 31-40  Average | 41-50 Satisfactory | 51-60 Stunning | 61-70 Terrific | 71-80 Must See | 81-90 Amazing | 91-100 Impressive
REVIEW OVERVIEW
Cinematography
80 %
Performances
80 %
Originality / Redefining
80 %
Plot
80 %
Practical Effects
5 %
Scare Factor
5 %
Special Effects
5 %
Viewing Experience
80 %
Previous articleShawn Burkett’s Don’t Fuck in the Woods -Film Review
Next articleSins Of Our Youth, A Tragic Drama Thriller -Film Review
Ken Artuz is Co-Owner of Meca Ex Studios LLC. Artuz is a New York City Based Photographer with proficiency in Photoshop. His digital artwork was featured in exhibitions SOHO, NYC, twice. Artuz is a graduate of The Institute of Audio Research where he earned his degree in Audio Engineering and Record Production. He also earned certification in Television Production and Field Recording at Lehman College. For Horror Artuz Favors French Extremism and Indie productions. He is a novelist, and screenwriter listens to EBM, Industrial & Witch house and is an avid MMA sports fan. Ken Artuz will create a media empire built on the DecayMag Brand.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.